fix(backend+tests): reactivate endpoint 500 + test schema mismatches (PRC-001)
Three bugs surfaced while user smoke-testing Reactivate: 1. ReactivateAsync opened a SECOND connection for GetByIdAsync after the SP call, inside the ambient TransactionScope. This promoted the tx to DTC (distributed) which requires MSDTC — typically not enabled on dev/prod servers. The API returned an opaque 500. Fix: run the post-SP SELECT on the SAME connection (local tx stays lightweight / LTM). 2. Agent 1's V023 test refactor wrote 'INSERT INTO dbo.ProductType (Nombre, Codigo, Activo)' in 2 test files — but dbo.ProductType has no 'Codigo' or 'Activo' columns (schema is Nombre + IsActive + flags + multimedia limits). Fix: use '(Nombre, HasDuration, RequiresText, RequiresCategory, IsBundle, AllowImages)' matching the other test files (ProductQueryRepositoryTests, ProductRepositoryTests, ProductPriceRepositoryIntegrationTests). 3. SqlTestFixture.EnsureV021SchemaAsync unconditionally ALTERed the V021-era SPs with '@MedioId' body. On second fixture run after V023 had already refactored the table, ALTER PROCEDURE body referenced a MedioId column that no longer existed — 'Invalid column name MedioId'. Fix: guard the V021 SP ALTERs + seedV022 behind 'MedioId column exists' check. If V023 already dropped MedioId, skip V021 re-install; EnsureV023SchemaAsync still recreates SPs with @ProductTypeId. 4. PricingExceptionTests still used 'medioId:' named-arg + '.MedioId' — Agent 2 renamed the exception property but not these 6 test references. Tests: 1297/1297 Application.Tests green.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -101,23 +101,23 @@ public sealed class PricingExceptionTests
|
||||
var activeVf = new DateOnly(2026, 4, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
var ex = new ChargeableCharConfigForwardOnlyException(
|
||||
medioId: 5, symbol: "$", newValidFrom: newVf, activeValidFrom: activeVf);
|
||||
productTypeId: 5, symbol: "$", newValidFrom: newVf, activeValidFrom: activeVf);
|
||||
|
||||
ex.MedioId.Should().Be(5);
|
||||
ex.ProductTypeId.Should().Be(5);
|
||||
ex.Symbol.Should().Be("$");
|
||||
ex.NewValidFrom.Should().Be(newVf);
|
||||
ex.ActiveValidFrom.Should().Be(activeVf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
public void ChargeableCharConfigForwardOnlyException_NullMedioId_IsAllowed()
|
||||
public void ChargeableCharConfigForwardOnlyException_NullProductTypeId_IsAllowed()
|
||||
{
|
||||
var ex = new ChargeableCharConfigForwardOnlyException(
|
||||
medioId: null, symbol: "$",
|
||||
productTypeId: null, symbol: "$",
|
||||
newValidFrom: new DateOnly(2026, 3, 1),
|
||||
activeValidFrom: new DateOnly(2026, 4, 1));
|
||||
|
||||
ex.MedioId.Should().BeNull();
|
||||
ex.ProductTypeId.Should().BeNull();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ public sealed class PricingExceptionTests
|
||||
var activeVf = new DateOnly(2026, 4, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
var ex = new ChargeableCharConfigForwardOnlyException(
|
||||
medioId: null, symbol: "$", newValidFrom: newVf, activeValidFrom: activeVf);
|
||||
productTypeId: null, symbol: "$", newValidFrom: newVf, activeValidFrom: activeVf);
|
||||
|
||||
ex.Message.Should().Contain("2026-03-01");
|
||||
ex.Message.Should().Contain("2026-04-01");
|
||||
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ public sealed class PricingExceptionTests
|
||||
public void ChargeableCharConfigForwardOnlyException_InheritsFromDomainException()
|
||||
{
|
||||
var ex = new ChargeableCharConfigForwardOnlyException(
|
||||
medioId: null, symbol: "$",
|
||||
productTypeId: null, symbol: "$",
|
||||
newValidFrom: new DateOnly(2026, 3, 1),
|
||||
activeValidFrom: new DateOnly(2026, 4, 1));
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user